Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts

Friday, 29 August 2014

Anonymous Site Spurs Talks Between Nikki Finke and Ex-Boss

The journalist Nikki Finke has long struck fear into the hearts of Hollywood executives and entertainers, publishing a blend of vitriol and scoops on her blog Deadline Hollywood.

In recent weeks, though, she had gone silent in the face of a legal dispute with the company that bought Deadline, Penske Media Corporation. It looked as if her career as a chronicler of Hollywood might be over. But now, a book deal and possible return to journalism are in the works.

Ms. Finke made headlines this week after an anonymous group calling itself “The Committee for Decency in Journalism” published a website, NikkiStink.com, that posted pictures and video of the rarely photographed Ms. Finke. It also threatened to disclose more secrets about Ms. Finke’s private life if she did not stop publishing her biting journalism.

Though most of that was taken down by Thursday, the website caused a stir in Hollywood. It also had an unintended effect, prompting a series of conversations between Ms. Finke and her former employer, Jay Penske, said a person with knowledge of the situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private discussions. Those talks could mean she will write again for Penske, which also owns Variety. The two recently signed a settlement agreement worth millions to Ms. Finke.

Ms. Finke has also nearly completed a nonfiction book on Hollywood that will be published by Simon & Schuster, its president, Jonathan Karp, said in an email. Mr. Karp, who said he was editing the book himself, declined to provide details about its contents and said a publication date had not been set. 
“Whenever we publish,” he wrote, “the book will be an event.”

A book by Ms. Finke will likely be met with dread in movie and television industry circles. An open letter to Ms. Finke, published this week on the mystery website, said that for years she had “threatened and bullied the Hollywood community into providing you information so that you could use it to ridicule, abuse and destroy people.”

The website listed 79 insults she had directed at stars like Robin Williams and executives like the former Disney chief Michael Eisner, most of them unprintable. Beneath them, under the bold headline “GOTJA!” — a dig at Ms. Finke’s habit of writing “TOLDJA” in her posts — were photographs of Ms. Finke that appeared to have been taken secretly. The site also included some personal information, including pictures of her apartment, and it mocked Ms. Finke for her weight, calling her “large.”  

By Thursday, the site’s content was replaced with a shorter letter. “We think we’ve made our point,” it said. “Should it become necessary to add even more powerful content we will. Believe us, we have it.”

It is unclear who is behind the site. It is registered to Domains by Proxy, a company in Scottsdale, Ariz., that protects the identities of people who sign up for websites. Its source code reveals little about its creators, except that the site had been set up with technology intended to serve large quantities of web traffic quickly, without crashing. The creators also appeared to have stripped identifying information from the pictures. 

“This is like the board game Clue,” said Matthew Belloni, the executive editor of The Hollywood Reporter, which was among the first to report the site’s existence. “Everyone in this town is a suspect.”

Some, like Mike Fleming Jr. of Deadline, denounced the site, calling it “reprehensible, meanspirited and disgusting.” Others said that it was, if anything, too easy on her journalistic tactics, though they would not say so for public attribution.

Ms. Finke started her blog in 2006, just as people began to exploit the web’s potential to spread stories that would not have found homes in traditional newspapers. She became known as a machine for scoops, and for her tough, personal style of reporting and writing. In 2009, Penske acquired the site. And then, in 2012, it also bought the industry trade magazine Variety, a competitor to Deadline. That set off a dispute that caused Ms. Finke to leave the company.
This June, she started NikkiFinke.com, her own site, and again began reporting on Hollywood in apparent defiance of a noncompete agreement with Penske. She stopped writing on Aug. 11. Because of restrictions connected to the settlement negotiations, neither Ms. Finke nor Penske representatives can speak publicly on the split or its aftermath. 

Ms. Finke has also been approached by Graydon Carter, the editor of Vanity Fair, about potentially writing for his magazine. On Twitter Thursday, Ms. Finke raised another possibility for her future to her 233,000 followers. Jack Shafer, a media columnist for Reuters, had suggested she “pack up my act and bring it to DC,” she wrote. “Others saying the same thing. Should I?”

More Info

Thursday, 7 February 2013

Staying Private on the New Facebook


Facebook is a personal vault that can contain photos of your firstborn, plans to bring down your government and, occasionally, a record of your indiscretions.

It can be scoured by police officers, partners and would-be employers. It can be mined by marketers to show tailored advertisements.

And now, with Facebook’s newfangled search tool, it can allow strangers, along with “friends” on Facebook, to discover who you are, what you like and where you go. 

Facebook insists it is up to you to decide how much you want others to see. And that is true, to some extent. But you cannot entirely opt out of Facebook searches. Facebook, however, does let you fine-tune who can see your “likes” and pictures, and, to a lesser extent, how much of yourself to expose to marketers.
The latest of its frequent changes to the site’s privacy settings was made in December. Facebook is nudging each of its billion subscribers to review them. 

The nudge could not have been more timely, said Sarah Downey, a lawyer with the Boston company Abine, which markets tools to help users control their visibility online. “It is more important than ever to lock down your Facebook privacy settings now that everything you post will be even easier to find,” she said.
That is to say, your settings will determine, to a large extent, who can find you when they search for women who buy dresses for toddlers or, more unsettling, women who jog a particular secluded trail.
What can you do? Ask yourself four simple questions. 

QUESTION 1 How would you like to be found?
Go to “who can see my stuff” on the upper right side of your Facebook page. Click on “see more settings.” By default, search engines can link to your timeline. You can turn that off if you wish.
Go to “activity log.” Here you can review all your posts, pictures, “likes” and status updates. If you are concerned about who can see what, look at the original privacy setting of the original post.
In my case, I had been tagged eating a bowl of ricotta with my fingers at midnight near Arezzo. My friend who posted the picture enabled it to be seen by anyone, which means that it would show up in a stranger’s search for, I don’t know, people who eat ricotta with their fingers at midnight. I am tagged in other photos that are visible only to friends of the person who posted them.
The point is, you want to look carefully at what the original settings are for those photos and “likes,” and decide whether you would like to be associated with them.
“I don’t get this Facebook thing either,” said one woman whose friend request I had accepted in January 2008. “But everyone in our generation seems to be on it.”
If you are concerned about things that might embarrass or endanger you on Facebook — Syrians who endorse the opposition may not want to be discovered by government apparatchiks — comb through your timeline and get rid of them. The only way to ensure that a post or photo is not discovered is to “unlike” or “delete” it.
Make yourself a pot of tea. This may take a while. The nostalgia may just be amusing. 

QUESTION 2 What do you want the world to know about you?
Go to your profile page and click “About me.” Decide if you would like your gender, or the name of your spouse, to be visible on your timeline. Think about whether you want your birthday to be seen on your timeline. Your date of birth is an important piece of personal information for hackers to exploit.
A tool created a couple of weeks ago by a team of college students offers to look for certain words and phrases that could embarrass other college students as they apply for internships and jobs. It is called Simplewash, formerly Facewash, and it looks for profanity, references to drugs and other faux pas that you do not necessarily want, say, a law school admissions officer to see.
Socioclean is another application that scours your Facebook posts. It is selling its service to college campuses to offer to students. 

QUESTION 3 Do you mind being tracked by advertisers?
Facebook has eyes across the Web; one study found that its so-called widget — the innocuous blue letter “f” — is integrated into 20 percent of the 10,000 most popular Web sites. If that is annoying, several tools can help you block trackers. Abine, DisconnectMe and Ghostery offer browser extensions. Once installed on your Web browser, these extensions will tell you how many trackers they have blocked.
Facebook also has a mechanism to show you ads based on the Web sites you have visited. It works with third-party companies to place cookies on my computer when, for instance, I visit an e-commerce site. That brand knows that I might be looking at girls’ dresses. It can ask Facebook to show me an ad for girls’ dresses when I log in to Facebook. You can control this. Hover over the “X” next to the ad and choose from the drop-down menu: “Hide this ad,” you could say. Or hide all ads from this brand. Facebook does not serve the ads itself, so to opt out of certain kinds of targeted ads, you must go to the third party that Facebook works with to show ads based on the Web sites you have browsed.

QUESTION 4 Whom do you want to befriend?
Now is the time to review whom you count among your Facebook friends. Your boss? Do you really want her to see pictures of you in Las Vegas? And the woman you met in Lamaze class: do you want the apps she has installed to know who you are?
Privacyfix.com, a browser extension, shows you how to keep your friends’ Facebook applications from sucking you into their orbit. It is preparing to introduce a tool to control what it calls your “exposure” to the Facebook search engine.
Secure.me offers a similar feature. Depending on your privacy settings, that photo-sharing app that your Lamaze compatriot just installed could, in one click, know who you are and have access to all the photos that you thought you were sharing with “friends.”
One of Facebook’s cleverest heists is the word “friend.” It makes you think all your Facebook contacts are really your “friends.” They may not be.

Obagi

 Similar Resource